What is two-party consent?

Two-party consent
Two-party consent, more accurately called all-party consent, means every person on a call must agree before it can lawfully be recorded, rather than just the person doing the recording.

Federal law in the United States sets a floor at one-party consent. States are free to be stricter and several are.

The name is misleading once a third person joins, which is why all-party is the better term for the same idea.

The messy part is a call that crosses state lines, which describes most inbound business calls. Which state's rule governs is not always obvious.

What people get wrong

An area code tells you nothing

Say your office is in a state where one party's consent is enough, and you've decided that means you don't need a recording notice. A call comes in from an area code that belongs to a state with a stricter rule. Is the caller there?

You can't know. Americans have been able to keep their cell numbers when they move since 2003, so an area code mostly tells you where someone lived when they got their first phone. Your caller might be a local who went to college elsewhere, or a traveler in an airport in a third state. She might also be sitting in the stricter state right now. A rule like "play the notice only for certain area codes" will be wrong in both directions every day. That's the practical case for a notice on every call: it's the only version that doesn't depend on a fact you have no way to check.

When the caller says no

A notice creates a question most businesses never plan for. What happens when a caller hears "this call may be recorded" and says, "I'd rather it wasn't"? It doesn't come up often, but it does come up. People who object also tend to be the ones who'd make a fuss about it later.

Decide the answer in advance and write it down. One option is to offer an unrecorded path, such as a transfer to a staff member's line or a callback from one. Another is to take a short message without recording and follow up by email. What you shouldn't do is improvise, or keep recording while the caller believes you've stopped.

Ask any vendor how their system handles an objection partway through a call, and whether the audio captured before the objection is kept. Then take both answers to your attorney, since we can describe a setting but we can't tell you what your state expects.

How GreetKeeper handles it

The workable posture is to disclose recording at the start of every call, which takes the disputed question off the table entirely.

GreetKeeper's recording is configurable and its disclosure setting is paired with it, so the two cannot drift apart.

We do not publish a list of which states require what, and we do not give legal advice. Your counsel decides the rule; we give you the switch.

Does a recorded notice count as consent?

The common reading is that a caller who is told at the start and stays on the line has consented by continuing. Whether that satisfies your state is a question for your lawyer.

Which state's law applies on an interstate call?

That is exactly the disputed part, and different sources reason about it differently. Disclosing on every call avoids having to resolve it.

Does consent cover transcripts too?

Do not assume it does. Ask about transcripts separately, since the rules were written about intercepting communications rather than about which format you keep.

Hear it take one of your calls

Two minutes, your own scenario, no card.